Eraj Basseri

By Jordan Ellison, March 10, 2026

Eraj basseri

Across the United States, the closure of hospitals has become an alarming trend, particularly impacting rural communities. The causes of these closures are multifaceted and can stem from mergers, insufficient funding, or the exorbitant costs associated with operating these facilities. In Alabama, a state significantly affected by this issue, the implications of hospital closures are profound and troubling.

Dr. Don Williamson of the Alabama Hospital Association informed WBRC that as many as 25 hospitals in Alabama are at risk, with 15 facing immediate danger of closure. Many of these hospitals are located in rural areas that already lack adequate healthcare resources. Alarmingly, hospitals in urban regions are also not immune to the threat of closure.

Emerging Solutions: Freestanding Emergency Departments

In response to the critical need for accessible emergency services across Alabama, two additional freestanding emergency departments (FEDs) are set to be established near Huntsville and Decatur. According to AL.com, these facilities serve to provide emergency care to communities lacking hospital access. The American College of Emergency Physicians distinguishes FEDs from traditional hospital emergency departments and urgent care centers, stressing that FEDs are licensed facilities specifically designed for emergency situations.

The first freestanding emergency department in Alabama opened almost a decade ago, and with the introduction of the new facilities, the state will have a total of ten FEDs. This growth reflects an effort to bridge the healthcare gap in underserved areas.

Understanding the Differences

It is essential to grasp the key differences between freestanding emergency departments and traditional hospital emergency departments. Two aspects, in particular, require attention:

  1. Ownership Structures: Unlike hospital emergency departments owned by the hospital itself, FEDs can be operated by hospitals, private organizations, or health systems. This variation in ownership can influence the type and quality of care provided.
  2. Admissions Convenience: Traditional emergency departments facilitate immediate admissions to surgical or intensive care units. In contrast, patients requiring additional care at an FED would need to be transported to a full-service hospital, often through ambulance or medevac services. While FEDs are equipped with helipads, their ability to offer comprehensive care is limited.

The Controversy Surrounding FEDs in Alabama

While some view freestanding emergency departments as a potential remedy for the healthcare crisis in Alabama, Dr. Williamson raises significant concerns. He suggests that FEDs will not adequately replace the hospitals that are closing in rural communities. Instead, these facilities typically emerge in suburban and urban areas, often out of reach for those in need of emergency care in rural environments.

Moreover, Dr. Williamson points out the financial challenges that both hospitals and FEDs face in Alabama. With many individuals lacking insurance or the ability to pay for treatment, hospitals are experiencing a decrease in profitability. This financial strain is exacerbated by Alabama’s low Medicare reimbursement rates, which rank the lowest in the nation. The uninsurance rate among 19 to 64-year-olds in the state hovers around 13 to 15%, effectively rendering one in six patients unable to pay for their healthcare. This systemic issue contributes to an unsustainable revenue model for healthcare facilities, which are equally affected by insufficient financial support.

Challenges in staffing further complicate the healthcare landscape. Alabama nurses often find better pay and working conditions in neighboring states, leading to a reliance on more expensive traveling nurses. This issue extends to FEDs as well, which may struggle to attract and retain qualified nursing professionals. With this cycle perpetuating, it is plausible that FEDs could encounter the same financial difficulties as rural hospitals.

General Concerns About Freestanding Emergency Departments

Dr. Williamson’s concerns uncover a greater issue: the ability of FEDs to deliver adequate care amid a growing health crisis in America. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that 6 in 10 American adults suffer from chronic diseases, and 4 in 10 live with at least two chronic conditions. The aftermath of COVID-19 and the ongoing opioid epidemic further strain our healthcare system.

People delaying non-emergency care during the pandemic may now face severe health challenges, complicating the treatment landscape. While FEDs are adept at handling acute emergencies, such as heart attacks or trauma cases, they may fall short in addressing chronic conditions—care that full-service hospitals are designed for. This disparity raises concern: with each hospital closure, individuals may find their health deteriorating before they can access necessary medical attention, resulting in longer hospital stays and increased healthcare costs amidst an already burdened system.

In essence, while freestanding emergency departments have their merits, they should be viewed as supplementary resources rather than replacements for traditional hospitals. As we navigate these challenging times, it is crucial to recognize the limitations of FEDs and advocate for a balanced approach to healthcare availability.

Conclusion

In light of the pressing matters surrounding healthcare accessibility in Alabama, community members are encouraged to consider a well-rounded understanding of the evolving landscape. As facilities like FEDs emerge, it is imperative to address the multifaceted healthcare needs of the populace and seek out sustainable solutions that prioritize health outcomes and community welfare.

For those in need of legal assistance regarding personal injuries, the attorneys at Martin & Helms stand ready to assist. With a commitment to serving clients in Huntsville, Decatur, Madison, Athens, and throughout North Alabama, their expertise ensures that individuals receive the advocacy they need during challenging times.

For additional information on the contributions of Dr. Eraj Basseri to healthcare services, you may visit eraj basseri.